KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDE AND PRACTICES ON FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION AMONG SOMALI COMMUNITY IN NAIROBI COUNTY, KENYA

Nasteha Hersi, Everlyne Ogugu, Fatuma Aden Affey

Abstract


Background: Female genital mutilation (FGM) is associated with many obstetric and gynecological complications. 

Study objective: The aim of the study was to assess knowledge, attitude and practice of female genital mutilation among Somali community in Eastleigh, Nairobi County.

Methodology:  Descriptive cross-sectional study was done among women living in Eastleigh, Nairobi and who have one or more daughters. Systematic random sampling was used to obtain 61 respondents. Questionnaires and interview schedules were used to collect the data.

Results:  All the respondents were aware of FGM entails and 80.3% were knowledgeable on its complications. Despite the medical complications related to FGM practice 45.9% of the respondents said FGM should continue, 45.9% said FGM should be stopped while 8.2% were noncommittal.

Recommendation: There is a need for campaigns that will target behavioral changes toward the practice, using those who have already abandoned the practice as community role models. 


Keywords


female genital mutilation, somali, kenya

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afrol news 2010. Prevalence of Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) in Africa. Accessed on 14.09.2015 http//www.afrol.com/categories/women/fgm/net.scapeindex.htm

Bandura A. (1986) Social Foundation of Thoughts and Action. Eaglewoods Cliff New Jersey. Prentice-Hall

Kuhn, A., 2009. Effects of female genital mutilation on birth outcomes in Switzerland. Br. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 116, 1204–1209.

Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS) and ICF Macro. (2010). Kenya Demographic and Health Survey 2008-09. Calverton, Maryland: KNBS and ICF Macro.

Leye, E., Powell, R.A., Nienhuis, G., Claeys, P., Temmerman, M., 2006. Health care in

Leye, E., Ysebaert, I., Deblonde, J., Claeys, P., Vermeulen, G., Jacquemyn, Y., Temmerman, M., 2008. Female genital mutilation: knowledge, attitudes and practices of FGM. . Obstet. Gynaecol. 27, 161–164

Lundbergh, P.C., Gerezgiher, A., 2008. Experiences from pregnancy and childbirth related to female genital mutilation among Eritrean immigrant women in Sweden. Midwifery 24, 214–225.

Médecins du Monde, 2011. Data Collection.Quantitative Methods. The KAP SurveyModel (Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices)

Momoh, (2010) Female genital mutilation: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tre.142/full searched on 4/3/2016

Nienhuis G., Haaijer I., 2006. Ignorance of female circumcision may hamper adequate care. WerkgroepIntercultureleVerpleging. Ed(s). Intercultureel Verplegen. De Tijdstroom, Utrecht.

Paliwal, P., Ali, S., Bradshaw, S., Hughes, A., Jolly, K., 2013. Management of type III female genital mutilation in Birmingham, UK: a retrospective audit. Midwifery 30, 282–288.

Powell, A.R., Leye, E., Jayakody, A., Mwangi-Powell, F., Morison, L., 2004. Female genital mutilation, asylum seekers and refugees: the need for an integrated European Union agenda. Health Policy 70, 151–162.

Rahman, Anika & Toubia, Nahid 2010. Female genital mutilation; a guide to laws andpolicies worldwide, London, New York: Zed books

Silverman, David 2012. Doing qualitative research. A practical handbook. Second edition. New York: Sage publications.

UNICEF (2013). Female genital Mutilation/Cutting: A Statistical Overview and Exploration of the Dynamics of Change. United Nations Children's Fund, New York.

UNPFA. (2012). Europe for women with genital mutilation. Health Care Women Int. 27,

WHO. (2008). Eliminating Female Genital Mutilation: An interagency statement. Accessed on 12.07.2015 http://www.who.int/reproductive-health.

Yoder, P.S., Khan, S., 2008. Numbers of Women Circumcised in Africa: The Production of a

Vloeberghs, E., Knipscheer, J., van der Kwaak, A., Naleie, Z., van den Muijsenbergh,M., (2011). Veiled pain: A Study in the Netherlands on the Psychological, Socialand Relational Consequences of Female Genital Mutilation. Pharos, Utrecht.

Total (DHS Working Papers, No. 39).United States Agency for International Development.

Zaidi, N., Khalil, A., Roberts, C., Browne, M., 2013.Knowledge of Female Genital Mutilation among Health Professionals. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 27, 161–164.

Zenner, N., Liao, L.-M., Richens, Y., Creighton, M., 2013. Quality of obstetric andmidwifery care for pregnant women who have undergone female genitalmutilation. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 33, 459–462.

Rashid, M., Rashid, M.H., 2007. Obstetric management of women with femalegenital mutilation (review). Obstet. Gynaecol. 9, 95–101.

RCM [Royal College of Midwives], 2012. Female Genital Mutilation: Report of aSurvey on Midwives' Views and Knowledge. Royal College of Midwives Trust,London


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Comments on this article

View all comments


Copyright (c) 2017 Kenyan Journal of Nursing & Midwifery

© Numid Publishers        ISSN:  2518-8631